Hi Peter,
Thanks very much for your detailed review for this draft! We will fix these
issues in the next version.
Thanks,
-- Yimin Shen
On 6/21/19, 12:50 AM, "Peter Yee via Datatracker" wrote:
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART revi
Francis, thank you for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On May 13, 2019, at 8:47 AM, Francis Dupont wrote:
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF
Joel, thanks for your reviews. I entered a No Objection ballot. I trust that
the identifier assignments will work out with NIST.
Alissa
> On Mar 31, 2019, at 1:28 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>
> Maybe a note that the assignment will take place once the drafts are
> approved, and that the RFC s
The latest version (which I reviewed yesterday) has the assignments.
Joel
On 6/25/19 12:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
Joel, thanks for your reviews. I entered a No Objection ballot. I trust that
the identifier assignments will work out with NIST.
Alissa
On Mar 31, 2019, at 1:28 AM, Joel M. Hal
Apologies, I thought the concern remained about the TBD identifiers in the
document.
Alissa
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>
> The latest version (which I reviewed yesterday) has the assignments.
> Joel
>
> On 6/25/19 12:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> Joel, thanks for y
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more informati
The remaining TBD identifiers will be assigned by IANA.
Russ
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:34 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
> Apologies, I thought the concern remained about the TBD identifiers in the
> document.
> Alissa
>
>> On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>>
>> The latest v
Hello Dan, and thanks for your review. Comments inline.
1. In section 2.1:
>
> > The default port
>for Babel over DTLS is registered with IANA as the "babel-dtls" port
>(UDP port TBD, see Section 4), and the port exchanging unencrypted
>Babel traffic is registered as the "babel" port (
Thanks for the quick reply.
See in-line.
regards,
Dan
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:29 PM David Schinazi
wrote:
> Hello Dan, and thanks for your review. Comments inline.
>
> 1. In section 2.1:
>>
>> > The default port
>>for Babel over DTLS is registered with IANA as the "babel-dtls" port
>>
Thanks Dan. I've pushed a commit with your suggestions:
https://github.com/jech/babel-drafts/commit/8d6a6fc05ce4c621b38d2c7621c4157300380078
We'll upload -06 at the end of this round of comments.
David
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:41 AM Dan Romascanu wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> See
10 matches
Mail list logo