Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id-06

Hi Elwyn, Thank You for the review! Please see inline. >Summary: >Ready with nits. There are a couple of minor issues related to the procedures >after inappropriate usage of the new header. > >Major issues: >None > >Minor issues: > > s3.4.1, last para: In line with the last sentence of Section

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id-06

Hi, Christer. Thanks for the quick response. Looks like we are clear on all this, except that:1.  I would suggest making it explicit that you can add a Content-ID header even to a message with a multipart message-body to avoid any confusion.  I am not sure that it makes any sense but I guess it

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id-06

On 6/23/17 10:53 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote: 2. If a message of a kind that can legitimately have a Content-ID arrives with a Content-ID (or indeed any Content-*) header but no message-body, presumably one would send a 400 error with a suitable reason phrase. I think it would be worth being expl

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id-06

Hi, >Looks like we are clear on all this, except that: >1. I would suggest making it explicit that you can add a Content-ID header >even to a > message with a multipart message-body to avoid any confusion. I am not sure > that it > makes any sense but I guess it wouldn't do any harm. I sugges

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, pleas

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-05

[Resending with corrected review date] I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version o

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07

Hi Christer, Thanks for your review. Comments below. On 6/22/17 1:09 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > > > > Document:

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation-05

Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review result: Ready with Issues Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation-05 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please t