Dear Les,
I see that you "agreed" to correct two typos only.
I disagree with your reasons for not making the document more readable and
complete. Note that "more complete" doesn't necessarily mean "more
prescriptive". It means removing ambiguities that will continue hurting
interoperability of
Thanks Pete,
On 6 April 2017 at 15:52, Pete Resnick wrote:
> A "keyid" parameter SHOULD be a UTF-8
> [RFC3629] encoded string, particularly where the identifier
> might
> need to appear in a textual form.
>
> I presume that simply means "might need to be rendered" and does not
>
