Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

On 10/02/2017 03:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Stewart, On 10/02/2017 04:19, Stewart Bryant wrote: ... I wonder if we would best serve both our future and our heritage if we declared RFC1981 as historic, and either left the idea there, or declared it as historic and wrote a new text from a cle

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hi Charlie, I have not yet seen a response to this review. Do you think you will be able to get to this in the next day or two? The document is on the February 16 2017 telechat and I would like to see resolution to these issues in time for the other ADs to ballot. Thanks Suresh On 2/2/17, 1:

[Gen-art] Review Assignments

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: For telechat 2017-02-16 Reviewer Type LC end Draft Brian CarpenterTelechat 2017-02-09 draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-23 * Francis Dupont Last Call 2017-02-14 draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules-03 * Orit Levin

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hello folks, The last two days have been crammed full with other urgent work requirements. I will respond to these comments today. Suresh, do you mean to ask if I can submit a revised document before Monday? Regards, Charlie P. On 2/10/2017 6:17 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Hi Charlie, I

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hi Charlie, > On Feb 10, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Charlie Perkins > wrote: > > Hello folks, > > The last two days have been crammed full with other urgent work requirements. > I will respond to these comments today. Great. > > Suresh, do you mean to ask if I can submit a revised document before

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi, about ECMP I think RFC1981bis should be OK even if ECMP is used in the network as long as ICMP PTBs are not blocked. RFC1981bis will eventually converge to the minimum MTU of all paths in the multipath, and so it is still OK to store the MTU in the network layer where it would be shared by all

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

On 10/02/2017 23:20, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > > On 10/02/2017 03:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Stewart, >> >> On 10/02/2017 04:19, Stewart Bryant wrote: >> ... >>> I wonder if we would best serve both our future and our heritage >>> if we declared RFC1981 as historic, and either left the idea

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hello Dale, Thanks for the thorough review. My follow-up comments are inline below. On 1/31/2017 11:34 AM, Dale Worley wrote: 1. The Introduction states Other types of identifiers are in common use, and even referenced in RFC 4283. For the reader's sanity, some sort of accounting ne

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-23

Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review result: Ready Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-23 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction fr

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-08

Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a ne

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:45 -0800 , Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 10/02/2017 23:20, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > On 10/02/2017 03:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > On 10/02/2017 04:19, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > > > I wonder if we would best serve both our future and our heritage > > > > if we declared

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-23

Hi Brian, I will fix the case in the next version. Thanks! Regards, Christer Sent from my iPhone > On 11 Feb 2017, at 1.06, Brian Carpenter wrote: > > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Ready > > Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-23 > > I am the assigned Ge

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi Mike, On Feb 10, 2017 11:30 PM, "C. M. Heard" wrote: On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:45 -0800 , Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 10/02/2017 23:20, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > On 10/02/2017 03:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > On 10/02/2017 04:19, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > > > I wonder if we would best ser