Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17

2017-01-04 Thread Thomas Watteyne
Brian, Just a quick admin update that the authors have taken your comments into account, which will be integrated in -18. We will discuss the proposed resolutions at an interim meeting this Friday and publish it next week. Thomas On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Brian Carpenter < brian.e.carpen..

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17

2017-01-04 Thread Thomas Watteyne
Brian, all, We have discussed the possible resolutions to your comments with Xavi. I have captured those in a slideset [1] to be presented at this Friday's interim meeting [2]. Early comments about the discussions and proposed resoltuion in the slideset, in preparation for their presentation on F

[Gen-art] Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-03

2017-01-04 Thread Jouni Korhonen
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new versio

Re: [Gen-art] [Insipid] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-11

2017-01-04 Thread Arun Arunachalam (carunach)
Hi Stewart, Thanks for taking the time to review ! Please see inline and let us know your input. > On Jan 3, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-03

2017-01-04 Thread Christer Holmberg
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document:   draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-03.txt Reviewer:                         Christer Holmberg Review Date:    

Re: [Gen-art] [Insipid] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-11

2017-01-04 Thread Stewart Bryant
Hi Arun Those changes look good to me. Thanks Stewart On 04/01/2017 17:53, Arun Arunachalam (carunach) wrote: Hi Stewart, Thanks for taking the time to review ! Please see inline and let us know your input. On Jan 3, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART r

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-03

2017-01-04 Thread Julien ÉLIE
Hi Jouni, (I did review the -00 version and my comment have been already addressed in -01) Thanks for your verification :) Nits/editorial comments: For the consistency Section 1.2. Author's note should probably be also tagged and explained how the RFC Editor is supposed to handle it. I ass

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17

2017-01-04 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Thomas, The responses to my comments almost all look fine to me. Just one point, on MINOR COMMENT 4 (slide 8): "Shouldn't this also say that this value MUST NOT be used in operational networks?" We've seen many cases over the years of informal values making it into shipped products... genera

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13

2017-01-04 Thread Robert Sparks
Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For mo

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06

2017-01-04 Thread Wassim Haddad
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > Document: draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06 Reviewer: Wassim Haddad Review Date: