Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-02 (Als was: Secdir review of draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-02)

2016-12-12 Thread Ondřej Surý
Magnus and Dan, thanks for the review. Magnus, you are right, I have removed the first full paragraph about "security properties" from Security Considerations from my git version as the security properties of EdDSA are better described in Normative references anyway. https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/l

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-02 (Als was: Secdir review of draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-02)

2016-12-12 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hi Ondřej, On 12/12/16 09:38, Ondřej Surý wrote: > I would be happy to upload next revision after Last Call > is finished or just let the RFC editors to fix it. Please do upload a new version at the end of last call with these and any other non-controversial changes. Thabks, S. smime.p7s Des

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-02 (Als was: Secdir review of draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-02)

2016-12-12 Thread Dan Romascanu
Hi Ondrej, Thanks for addressing my comments. The nits can be fixed at any time you find more convenient before publication. Regards, Dan On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Magnus and Dan, > > thanks for the review. > > Magnus, you are right, I have removed the first ful

[Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11

2016-12-12 Thread Robert Sparks
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] [Idr] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11

2016-12-12 Thread Job Snijders
Dear Robert, On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:43:33PM -0600, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > any other

Re: [Gen-art] [Idr] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11

2016-12-12 Thread Robert Sparks
On 12/12/16 1:11 PM, Job Snijders wrote: Dear Robert, On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:43:33PM -0600, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please tre

Re: [Gen-art] [Idr] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11

2016-12-12 Thread Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
A little more context regarding reserved communities: The RFC 1997 reserved community values 65535:* will be presented to the routing policy when received, just like any other community values. The routing policy can match on them and set or delete them, just like any other community values. The

Re: [Gen-art] [Idr] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11

2016-12-12 Thread Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
> > > > Jakob Heitz responded to the suggestion to extend the reserved Global > > Administrator values, but for some reason I can't find that email in the > > IETF IDR archive, I've copy+pasted it here: > > > > - > > Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 03:16:52 +0100 > > From: "Jakob Heitz (