Hi Brian,
More inline.
Brgds,
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 21:58
To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS;
draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model@ietf.org; General Area Review Team
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Ca
Hi Brian, all,
[including the L3SM mailing list]
It will be a very useful addition to add a few words about : "We did not
wanted to add all the possible options, but the most current ones. New
scenarios can always been added through augmentations.", as mentioned by
Stephane.
In terms of QoS
Orit,
Thanks for the review, making sure the editor see this.
Kathleen
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Orit Levin wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair.
Just front-posting for this point:
> Indeed, we should pay attention that this Service YANG model doesn't
> turn into a full device configuration model.
Understood. I guess my concern is that people may make false assumptions
from the service model about what it implies for configuration. Thus
"
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please s
[N.B. I have added the l3sm list but I am not subscribed]
On 07/10/2016 20:46, stephane.litkow...@orange.com wrote:
...
>>> 5.12.2.2. QoS profile
...
> [SLI2] The current model supports classification based on generic DSCP
> values. Isn't it enough ?
Yes, I missed that. I agree, that seems the
