Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04

2016-08-30 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your detailed, review, Peter. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09

2016-08-30 Thread Jari Arkko
Brian, Andy, thanks for the reviews and changes and new versions. I plan to ballot “no objection” for this document on Thursday. That being said, I do note the BCP/PS question, and my own opinion is that BCP would have equal strength, and if it were up to me, I’d pick that category. However, I’

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt

2016-08-30 Thread Jari Arkko
Many thanks for the review, Joel! Jari On 26 Aug 2016, at 03:55, Joel Halpern wrote: > This document is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. > > (I think I even see why the reference in section 3.3 is point to 2.1.) > > Yours, > Joel > > On 7/5/16 6:26 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrot

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03

2016-08-30 Thread Jari Arkko
Robert — thanks for the review (again)! And thanks everyone for a document that to me seems quite useful and necessary. I do have a similar concern as Robert did, however, in making sure that the change to 7344 is properly highlighted. Joel, did you have a plan on how to make that happen? I hav

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-10

2016-08-30 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for the review again, Joel! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-avtext-rid-06

2016-08-30 Thread Jari Arkko
Russ, Many thanks for your reviews, including this one. I plan to ballot no-objection for this draft. Some further comments inline: > Summary: Ready > > Major Concerns: None > > Minor Concerns: > > I think it would be useful to move the last paragraph in Section 3.3 > into a Privacy Consider

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01

2016-08-30 Thread Jouni Korhonen
see inline. 8/29/2016, 2:45 PM, Bill Fenner kirjoitti: On Aug 29, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direct

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-hardy-pdf-mime-02

2016-08-30 Thread Dan Romascanu
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please