Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-trill-irb-13.txt

Thanks. On 06 Jul 2016, at 18:35, Donald Eastlake wrote: > Hi, > > These are all fixed in version -14 except that the last comment re > Section 7.1 to make the change "TENANT-LABEL -> TENANT-GWMAC-LABEL" > still has a tiny glitch in it. In particular, there is an extra space > just before "GWMA

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2016-07-08

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft - Brian Carpenter 2016-07-21 draft-ietf-clue-datachannel-13 Christer Holmberg 2016-07-21 draft-ietf-xrblock-independent

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-19.txt

Hi All, (As and author) I am still working through the last of the IESG comments, but I wanted to post an update before the draft deadline. This update should address all of the opsdir, secdir, and genart comments, as well as all of the DISCUSSes and most of the non-DISCUSS comments. Sti

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03

(Just to Gen-art) Wow. I don't understand how you arrived at that summary. Based on the rest of the review I was expecting to be at least Not Ready. Are my standards wrong? Thanks, Paul On 7/8/16 4:32 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03

There's not much beyond nits for the _authors_ to deal with. The process problem is one for Joel (the responsible AD) and the rest of the IESG. I think a "ready with nits and a process problem" sends a better signal to the people who can _do_ something about it than a "not ready" would. RjS