Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis

Hi Barry, Here is a problem I encounter with the registration policy due to IESG not verifying the policy for registration. The first registry requires standard action http://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-security-descriptions/sdp-security-descriptions.xhtml#sdp-security-descriptions-3 This one h

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis

> I think that there should be normative language to the IESG to verify > consistency In principle, I agree with you, but there are practical considerations. First, I'm pretty sure we don't have IETF consensus to say that working groups MUST carefully consider the registration policies, coordina

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis

Hi Barry, Thanks for the explanation. It make sense to me. I hope that the document will help with getting better defined registries in the future. Maybe we can present this document, once it is done, at one of the WG chairs lunches at the IETF meeting Roni > -Original Message- > From

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05 Reviewer