[Gen-art] GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08

On 29 Mar 2016, at 20:57, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I see your point, though. Would you buy something like this? > > "...see [RFC6701] for details of the sanctions defined in > various existing Best Current Practice documents". Sure, no objection to that if it makes you more comfortable. pr --

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2016-03-31

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft - Wassim Haddad2016-04-15 draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-04 * * 2nd LC I have made the assignments in the review tool: http://art.tools

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08

Brian, Pete: > I see your point, though. Would you buy something like this? > > "...see [RFC6701] for details of the sanctions defined in > various existing Best Current Practice documents". > > Sure, no objection to that if it makes you more comfortable. WFM. Jari signature.asc Description

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-pta-flags-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at