Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dprive-edns0-padding-02

Thanks for your review, Vijay!! Jari On 26 Feb 2016, at 22:17, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comments along wi

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt

Francis: many thanks for your review (again). Julian: thanks for checking the review results and responding. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mail

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-behave-requirements-update

Thanks for the review & the quick updates. Much appreciated, both. I have balloted no-obj for this document. Jari On 16 Feb 2016, at 14:53, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > Thank you for the quick update. All the (minor) issues that I raised were > addressed. From the Gen-ART point of view this

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-04

On 3/2/16 2:16 AM, Tal Mizrahi wrote: Hi Paul, Rather, my concern is that RFC5905 says when there are extensions in the message they will always be followed by a MAC. (There is no provision for an extension without a MAC.) Please note that this part of RFC5905 was corrected by erratum 3627

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please s

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notificaiton-04

Thanks for responding, Rachel. I think your proposed text is good. I'm not sure what more can be said or done, but this at least acknowledges it. -- - m&m Matt Miller Cisco Systems, Inc. > On Mar 1, 2016, at 19:23, Huangyihong (Rachel) > wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > Please see my replies inli