Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-04

Hi Paul, A new version of the draft has been posted, and I believe it addresses all the comments you raised. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-05 Thanks, Tal. >-Original Message- >From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu] >Sent: Sunday, February 28, 20

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt

Hi Francis, thanks for the feedback. On 2016-02-29 15:07, Francis Dupont wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other l

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

Hi Roni, Looks like this was missed - sorry for the absence of a response. WRT section 6.3.2 (now section 5.3.2) "persistently fails to deliver acceptable TDM service" is discussed in significant detail in Appendix A of the referenced [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] - it turns out to be a much longer dis

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

Hi David, This will be good. Thanks Roni From: Black, David [mailto:david.bl...@emc.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:26 PM To: Roni Even; draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker@tools.ietf.org Cc: i...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-br

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-04

Hi Tal, On 3/1/16 4:17 AM, Tal Mizrahi wrote: Hi Paul, A new version of the draft has been posted, and I believe it addresses all the comments you raised. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-05 Thanks. This rev addresses most of my concerns. I still have one concern:

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notificaiton-04

I am the coincidentally-assigned Gen-ART and SecDir reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. The Security Directorate reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the security area direc

[Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notificaiton-04

Hi Matt, Please see my replies inline. BR, Rachel > -Original Message- > From: Matt Miller (mamille2) [mailto:mamil...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:20 AM > To: draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification@ietf.org; The IESG; > gen-art@ietf.org; sec...@ietf.org > Subject

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-04

Hi Paul, >Rather, my concern is that RFC5905 says when there are extensions >in the message they will always be followed by a MAC. (There is no provision >for an extension without a MAC.) Please note that this part of RFC5905 was corrected by erratum 3627 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_sea