Re: [Gen-art] Telechat Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-ippm-checksum-trailer-05

Hi, This document is again on the agenda of the 2/4 telechat. My previous Telechat review stands. The document is ready. Thanks and Regards, Dan From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 5:09 PM To: General Area Review

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-09.txt

Thanks for the review, Francis, and my apologies for the belated reply. Please see my answers to your comments inlined below: On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Francis Dupont wrote: > [...] > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - 2 page 3:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-RTP LC review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-08

Jouni, Thank you for reviewing the document and apologies for the belated reply. Please find my answers to your comments inlined below: On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: [...] > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with > small nits to be cor

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-12 Reviewer:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-RTP LC review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-08

Thanks. I am OK with the proposed texts/corrections. Jouni Sent from a smart phone.. Mind the typos.. > Julien Laganier kirjoitti 31.1.2016 kello 15.55: > > Jouni, > > Thank you for reviewing the document and apologies for the belated > reply. Please find my answers to your comments inlined