Hi Elwyn,
First of all, thanks for the great comments. See a few responses inline below.
I’ll submit the new version now, hope it addresses all your comments.
> In particular, there doesn't seem to be any explanation of why the PLRs and
> MPTs have to be directly connected to the protected nod
Thank you very much Robert again for the review. I have placed a no-objection
position
for this document in the upcoming IESG telechat.
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.or
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please
Hi Robert,
> The document doesn't reflect the email discussion we had around how
> certain 3rd parties can cancel commands. I encourage adding at least a
> sentence reminding implementers and experimenting operators to remember
> that they can.
Based on this email discussion we have added the las
