Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05

Hi Andy, Thanks for the prompt response. >IMO returning the execution-time is not needed. >How far from the requested time do you expect the server to be? >Maybe a few milli-seconds? The scheduled-time refers to the *start time* of the RPC, whereas the execution-time refers to the *completion t

[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-dane-ops-14

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-dane-ops-14.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis-03

Hi Brian, Thanks for your review. Please see replies and proposed resolutions below. regards, Al > -Original Message- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 3:45 AM > To: draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis@ietf.org; General Area Review Tea

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05 Revie

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-dane-ops-14

On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 06:12:25PM +1000, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Minor issues: > I am not totally convinced about the remaining usage of RFC 2118 keywords, > but I'll leave that for the ADs to consider. Thanks for the feedback. Rereading to see what SHOULDs/MUSTs/... might warrant adjustment. >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis-03

Hi Al, On 03/08/2015 06:45, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: > If we seek to identify several more distinctions for "packets of Type-P", > then I would prefer to update the RFC 2330 Framework Section 13 on > this topic, so it's more widely applicable and less IPv4-centric. > I'll take immediate ste