[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04.txt Reviewer:Ch

Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-05-21

Hi Jean, I assume that you mean > Dan Romascanu 2015-06-03 draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22 (and not 2015-05-03) Otherwise, GenArt needs to provide time machines to its members :-) Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of A. J

Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-05-21

Hi Dan, 2015-06-03 is the correct deadline. I'm wondering about the time machines, though. The last call date for draft-ietf-rtcweb-video is now a week after the telechat, and the draft is still on the telechat. Thanks! Jean On 5/22/15 4:27 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: Hi Jean, I assu

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-02

Hi, please do submitt 03 Also take a look at Dan Romascanu's opsdir reivew. On 5/14/15 1:08 AM, Hirochika Asai wrote: > Dear Paul Kyzivat, > > > Thank you for your review. > > Since the Last call is in process, we do not submit the (current) revised > version but reply with inline comments a

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-sfc-architecture-08

Looks good except in section 6 there are couple typos: "BUilding from the categorization of [RFC7498], we can largely divide security consdierations in four areas:² 1. Change BUilding to Building. 2. Change consdierations to considerations. Jim On 5/21/15, 11:50 PM, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-sfc-architecture-08

Thanks Jim! Updated in the working copy. — Carlos. > On May 22, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Jim Guichard (jguichar) > wrote: > > Looks good except in section 6 there are couple typos: > > "BUilding from the categorization of [RFC7498], we can largely divide > security consdierations in four areas:² >

Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-05-21

On 5/22/15 8:32 AM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: Hi Dan, 2015-06-03 is the correct deadline. I'm wondering about the time machines, though. The last call date for draft-ietf-rtcweb-video is now a week after the telechat, and the draft is still on the telechat. It looks like the original last call

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04

On 5/22/15 4:26 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: Major Issues: Q1: As the ALPN header field can contain multiple, comma separated, header field values, I don’t think the ABNF is correct. It should be something like: ALPN = "ALPN":" protocol-id *(COMMA protocol-id) Yeah. The existing notation (1

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256

On 4/2/15 2:41 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive.