Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

2019-11-26 Thread Mark Nottingham
Hi Robert, thanks for the review. Responses below. > On 27 Nov 2019, at 9:47 am, Robert Sparks via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

2019-11-26 Thread Robert Sparks
Hi Martin - Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2019, at 5:16 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > > Thanks for the review Robert, > >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, at 09:47, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote: >> Neither the document nor the shepherds write-up acknowledge or explain the >> replacement of RFC6

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

2019-11-26 Thread Martin Thomson
Thanks for the review Robert, On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, at 09:47, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote: > Neither the document nor the shepherds write-up acknowledge or explain the > replacement of RFC6838 with RFC3986 for a reference for specifying fragment > identifier syntax and semantics (hence dro