Robert, thanks for your review. All, thanks for your responses and text
updates. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Mar 13, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this
On 3/18/20, 12:56 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
( warning: quote depth errors and top posting. keyur's mta, well let's
not get into that :)
> Speaking as a wg member.
and one of the first ROV implementors, tyvm.
> Shouldn’t you be checking the "my autonomous syste
( warning: quote depth errors and top posting. keyur's mta, well let's
not get into that :)
> Speaking as a wg member.
and one of the first ROV implementors, tyvm.
> Shouldn’t you be checking the "my autonomous system number" in the
> update message (when sending it out to the ebgp peer) as opp
Speaking as a wg member.
Shouldn’t you be checking the "my autonomous system number" in the update
message (when sending it out to the ebgp peer) as opposed to "my autonomous
system number" in the open message.
Regards,
Keyur
On 3/17/20, 8:27 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
> I wanted to avoid
> I like that and hope it's acceptable to the community.
>
> But it was a very small nit - if it turns out to be problematic, I'm
> ok leaving things as they were.
our illustrious AD is fond of specific references to RFCs and other
formal wording. :)
randy
_
I like that and hope it's acceptable to the community.
But it was a very small nit - if it turns out to be problematic, I'm ok
leaving things as they were.
RjS
On 3/17/20 10:26 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I wanted to avoid "be able to be" and have an explicit actor. I see
the difficulty you point
> I wanted to avoid "be able to be" and have an explicit actor. I see
> the difficulty you point to below.
i am happy to change to the following
>> As the origin AS may be modified by outbound policy, a BGP speaker
>> MUST apply ROV policy semantics using the My Autonomous System number
>> in the
On 3/17/20 8:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
thanks for review robert,
This sentence slowed me down when reading:
As the origin AS may be modified by outbound policy, policy semantics
based on RPKI Origin Validation state MUST be able to be applied
separately on distribution into BGP an
thanks for review robert,
> This sentence slowed me down when reading:
>
>As the origin AS may be modified by outbound policy, policy semantics
>based on RPKI Origin Validation state MUST be able to be applied
>separately on distribution into BGP and on egress.
>
> I suggest somethin
