The remaining TBD identifiers will be assigned by IANA.
Russ
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:34 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
> Apologies, I thought the concern remained about the TBD identifiers in the
> document.
> Alissa
>
>> On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>>
>> The latest v
Apologies, I thought the concern remained about the TBD identifiers in the
document.
Alissa
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>
> The latest version (which I reviewed yesterday) has the assignments.
> Joel
>
> On 6/25/19 12:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> Joel, thanks for y
The latest version (which I reviewed yesterday) has the assignments.
Joel
On 6/25/19 12:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
Joel, thanks for your reviews. I entered a No Objection ballot. I trust that
the identifier assignments will work out with NIST.
Alissa
On Mar 31, 2019, at 1:28 AM, Joel M. Hal
Joel, thanks for your reviews. I entered a No Objection ballot. I trust that
the identifier assignments will work out with NIST.
Alissa
> On Mar 31, 2019, at 1:28 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>
> Maybe a note that the assignment will take place once the drafts are
> approved, and that the RFC s
Maybe a note that the assignment will take place once the drafts are
approved, and that the RFC should coordiante with the authors and NIST
on this? (I presume we have done this before, and we do not have the
problem we have in some other cases of "no number until RFC" / "no RFC
until number".
> On Mar 30, 2019, at 5:55 AM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF
