Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-02.txt

Francis, thanks for your review. Warren, thanks for addressing Francis’ comments. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Mar 6, 2020, at 12:13 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > Whoops, apologies, I just realized that I forgot to mention that I've > posted a new version (-05) addressing these

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-02.txt

Whoops, apologies, I just realized that I forgot to mention that I've posted a new version (-05) addressing these / hit send too soon. Thank you again, Francis. W On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:09 PM Warren Kumari wrote: > > Wow, apologies, I had completely missed this email -- I have a complex > se

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-02.txt

Wow, apologies, I had completely missed this email -- I have a complex set of filtering rules to allow me to focus on drafts on the upcoming telechats, and this fell into the cracks. On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:57 AM Francis Dupont wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-02.txt

Thank you for your review, Francis. This was helpful. I think it will add additional clarity. Joe > On Feb 18, 2020, at 10:02, Francis Dupont wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-02.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at