Same here. Thank you!
/M
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> Thank you for addressing my comments.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> the IETF review has ended, so I have uploaded -03 version.
>>
>> Magnus, Dan,
Thank you for addressing my comments.
Regards,
Dan
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the IETF review has ended, so I have uploaded -03 version.
>
> Magnus, Dan,
>
> the -03 version addresses all your comments.
>
> Tim,
>
> I left the irtf documents in Normative
Hi all,
the IETF review has ended, so I have uploaded -03 version.
Magnus, Dan,
the -03 version addresses all your comments.
Tim,
I left the irtf documents in Normative as per Stephan's comments.
I believe that Section 8 correctly references IANA registry:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-
Hi Ondrej,
Thanks for addressing my comments. The nits can be fixed at any time you
find more convenient before publication.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Magnus and Dan,
>
> thanks for the review.
>
> Magnus, you are right, I have removed the first ful
Hi Ondřej,
On 12/12/16 09:38, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> I would be happy to upload next revision after Last Call
> is finished or just let the RFC editors to fix it.
Please do upload a new version at the end of last call
with these and any other non-controversial changes.
Thabks,
S.
smime.p7s
Des
Magnus and Dan,
thanks for the review.
Magnus, you are right, I have removed the first full paragraph
about "security properties" from Security Considerations
from my git version as the security properties of EdDSA
are better described in Normative references anyway.
https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/l
Thanks Dan for the review.
Yours,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2016 12:21 PM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa@ietf.org; cur...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
Subject: Review of draft-ietf-curdle
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
Summary: Ready, with nits
I am not an expert in this field, but the document seems to meet its
goals, it's clear and precise
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
1. Section 4: s/Section5.1.7/Sections 5.1.7/
2. Section 8:
