Pete, thanks for your review. Stewart, thanks for your response. I ran out of
time to ballot on this document unfortunately.
Alissa
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:48 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 30 Jun 2020, at 17:55, Pete Resnick wrote:
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2020, at 7:24, Stewart Bryant wrot
> On 30 Jun 2020, at 17:55, Pete Resnick wrote:
>
> On 30 Jun 2020, at 7:24, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
>>> On 29 Jun 2020, at 18:30, Pete Resnick via Datatracker
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Minor issues:
>>>
>>> It is not clear to me why this is being sent for Informational instead of
>>> Proposed St
On 30 Jun 2020, at 7:24, Stewart Bryant wrote:
On 29 Jun 2020, at 18:30, Pete Resnick via Datatracker
wrote:
Minor issues:
It is not clear to me why this is being sent for Informational
instead of
Proposed Standard. The shepherd's writeup does not justify it, and in
fact the
writeup refers
> On 29 Jun 2020, at 18:30, Pete Resnick via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For mor
