Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04

2022-04-05 Thread Lars Eggert
Roni, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars On 2021-4-2, at 10:58, Roni Even via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Tea

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04

2021-04-07 Thread Roni Even
Hi Daniel, About the difference between the draft and RFC4303 when reading for the first time I thought that section 7 is not the same as 2.8 in RFC4303 about integrity only but it was my mistake. So forget this comment. Still you use authentication while RFC4303 use integrity but the recommenda

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04

2021-04-02 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi Roni, Thanks for the review. We can of course add that RFC4303 is authoritative in the main body. I will update the document. I am wondering what differences you have in mind. Of course the document are different but I am wondering if there is anything we should clarify. Yours, Daniel

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04

2021-04-02 Thread Roni Even via Datatracker
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more i