Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

i Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 11:13 AM > > To: Black, David > > Cc: Paul Kyzivat; draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis@ietf.org; General > Area Review > > Team; Eggert, Lars > > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of &

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

Area > Review > Team; Eggert, Lars > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis > > Yes, I was off by a week :-) > > Fortunately doing this a week too early, not late :-) > > (I still need an answer, but next week is fine.) > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

vat >> Cc: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis@ietf.org; General Area Review Team; >> Eggert, >> Lars >> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of >> draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis >> >> Paul, all, >> >> Thanks for the review & effo

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

tober 05, 2016 10:50 AM > To: Paul Kyzivat > Cc: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis@ietf.org; General Area Review Team; > Eggert, > Lars > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis > > Paul, all, > > Thanks for the review & ef

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

Paul, all, Thanks for the review & efforts to change the document. Are we happy with the resolution of these issues, couple of months after the discussion? The document is on tomorrow’s IESG telechat, now in version -18. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMa

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

Hi, thanks for the review! I'll incorporate respective changes into -14. On 2016-05-28, at 20:23, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > After diffing this document against RFC5405 I see that it really is an > incremental change that leaves the scope largely unchanged except for the > addition of multicast. So

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

Hi, Paul, On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Black, David wrote: > Paul, > > > > So, (as WG chair for this paragraph only), thank you for your input, > but this is a > > single draft for very good reasons. > > > > > > > Thanks for the explanation. The thing about genart reviews is that the > > re

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

Paul, > > So, (as WG chair for this paragraph only), thank you for your input, but > > this is a > single draft for very good reasons. > > > > Thanks for the explanation. The thing about genart reviews is that the > reviewer doesn't have the context that the authors do, and maybe not the > cont

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

On 5/31/16 9:52 AM, Black, David wrote: Paul, Many thanks for the review. (1) Major? - Scope and Audience Beyond that it delves into a seeming random assortment of additional specialized uses of UDP. These may be of interest to some, but I suspect many won't find these things useful. And th

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

Paul, Many thanks for the review. > (1) Major? - Scope and Audience > Beyond that it delves into a seeming random assortment of additional > specialized uses of UDP. These may be of interest to some, but I suspect > many won't find these things useful. And the topics covered seem to be > simply

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at