Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric-08

Am 24.11.2015 um 17:32 schrieb Paul Kyzivat: Henning, On 11/24/15 10:09 AM, Henning Rogge wrote: Am 24.11.2015 um 16:00 schrieb Paul Kyzivat: So you are saying they are mutually exclusive: HELLO message by 9.4, all other packets by 9.3. Can you make the text clearer about this. As written it s

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric-08

Henning, On 11/24/15 10:09 AM, Henning Rogge wrote: Am 24.11.2015 um 16:00 schrieb Paul Kyzivat: So you are saying they are mutually exclusive: HELLO message by 9.4, all other packets by 9.3. Can you make the text clearer about this. As written it still could be interpreted as applying 9.3 to a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric-08

Am 24.11.2015 um 16:00 schrieb Paul Kyzivat: So you are saying they are mutually exclusive: HELLO message by 9.4, all other packets by 9.3. Can you make the text clearer about this. As written it still could be interpreted as applying 9.3 to all packets, including HELLO, and then applying 9.4 to

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric-08

The remedies below seem ok to me. One comment inline. On 11/24/15 8:16 AM, Henning Rogge wrote: Am 20.11.2015 um 21:41 schrieb Paul Kyzivat: * Section 1: "Appendix A contains a few possible steps to improve the DAT metric." This is the first occurrence of the "DAT" acronym. It took me a bit t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric-08

Am 20.11.2015 um 21:41 schrieb Paul Kyzivat: * Section 1: "Appendix A contains a few possible steps to improve the DAT metric." This is the first occurrence of the "DAT" acronym. It took me a bit to realize this must be referring to "Directional AirTime". Could you please define the acronym *be

Re: [Gen-art] GenART LC review of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03

Hi Roni, Thanks for your review. I will fix the editorial error in the next revision. Best regards, Xiaohu From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:54 PM To: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org Cc: i...@ietf.org Subject: G

[Gen-art] GenART LC review of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03 Revie