Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-conex-destopt-09

On 9/22/15 7:46 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: Hi, regarding M1: I don't think we can say much more in this doc than what is already said in the abstract mechanism doc as we simply don't know which protocol will be used on top of it. So should this document restrict the use of the extension to

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-04 (resend)

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements-01

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please s