[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-05-28

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft - Elwyn Davies 2015-06-09 draft-ietf-6lo-btle-13 Francis Dupont2015-06-09 draft-ietf-dhc-access-network-identifier-08 Joel Hal

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-02

And the proper way to state conformance requirements in MIB modules is to use the conformance definitions. /js On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:05:12AM -0400, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > Hirochika, > > Thanks for addressing my comments. I have one comment on -03: > > I see a change to use normative languag

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-02

Hirochika, Thanks for addressing my comments. I have one comment on -03: I see a change to use normative language in this section. But this particular one seems problematic: An implementation MUST support both, either of, or none of per-VM notifications and bulk notifications. This *lo

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review for draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis

On 5/28/15 1:03 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: Hi, What is missing in my opinion are more details for the operators about what tests can be made in order to avoid compatibility and migration problems. The text in draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22 says: Because it is possible that previously-valid

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-04

Many thanks again for your review, Alexey! Jari On 27 May 2015, at 15:37, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-sfc-architecture-08

Thanks for your review, Tom Jari On 22 May 2015, at 03:53, Tom Taylor wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-02

Hi, We have submitted -03 after the revision addressing Dan’s comments. Best, Hirochika Asai > On May 22, 2015, at 10:36 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > > Hi, please do submitt 03 > > Also take a look at Dan Romascanu's > > opsdir reivew. > > On 5/14/15 1:08 AM, Hirochika Asai wrote: >> Dear Pau

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth-22.txt

Thanks for your review, Joel. On 01 May 2015, at 05:45, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01

Thanks for your review, David. Jari On 21 Apr 2015, at 02:54, Black, David wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along with

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review for draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis

Hi, What is missing in my opinion are more details for the operators about what tests can be made in order to avoid compatibility and migration problems. The text in draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22 says: > Because it is possible that previously-valid JIDs might no longer be valid (or previou