Re: [Gen-art] [avtext] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-06

As an author of the only draft in the RFC Editor queue that's waiting on this taxonomy draft, (that would be draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp) I certainly did not put any pressure on anyone to rush publication of this taxonomy draft. The normative reference that's causing the dart draft to wait for this t

Re: [Gen-art] [avtext] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-06

In regard to the summary comment, I would like to confirm that the issue of when to publish was extensively discussed in the working group and between the working group chairs and the authors. It was agreed that nothing would be achieved by waiting and therefore there was consensus to move forwa

[Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-05-14

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft - Roni Even 2015-05-22 draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-10 Russ Housley 2015-05-28 draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-05 * Suresh Krishnan 2015

Re: [Gen-art] Pre-telechat review of draft-ietf-manet-tlv-naming-02

If you don't, you're liable to have to answer a question from IANA on that subject, so you might as well. Tom On 14/05/2015 4:44 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote: Tom I considered that the SMF types, which are HELLO message specific, were covered by the comment that there were no changes

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-02

Dear Hirochika Asai, The changes you describe below will resolve my concerns. Thanks, Paul On 5/14/15 4:08 AM, Hirochika Asai wrote: Dear Paul Kyzivat, Thank you for your review. Since the Last call is in process, we do not submit the (current) revised version but reply wit

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-02

Dear Paul Kyzivat, Thank you for your review. Since the Last call is in process, we do not submit the (current) revised version but reply with inline comments and the revised version attached in this mail. > * Figure 2: A few things are fuzzy about this figure: > > -- The meaning/purpose of

Re: [Gen-art] Pre-telechat review of draft-ietf-manet-tlv-naming-02

Tom I considered that the SMF types, which are HELLO message specific, were covered by the comment that there were no changes to the HELLO message specific TLVs. But as I need to fix the cut and paste error, I can add an explicit reference if you like. -- Christopher Dearlove Senior Principal