Hello,
I'm working on a thesis that includes fault injection in connection with
gem5 (ARM specific) and I'm looking for a way to implement some sort of
single stepping for this. I already found the method the RemoteGDB uses,
but there seems to be a problem with some machine instructions.
What
y looking at the
ExtMachInst and adjust it appropriately. I don't know what version of
the simulator you're using, but we fixed some identification of branch
instructions recently. THat said I'm very surprised that bxeq isn't
recognized as it certainly should be.
Ali
On 20.
7;t write any destination registers including the PC, so I'm not
sure how it could cause a branch.
Could you print out the bits of the machine instruction that you're
having a problem with?
Thanks,
Ali
On 02.10.2012 09:19, Tobias Friemel wrote:
I have tested both versions,
e where those are wrong.
Ali
On 02.10.2012 09:41, Tobias Friemel wrote:
From the objdump output it's "012fff13 bxeqr3".
And I used this code to get the instruction and print the decoded
version:
MachInst inst;
FSTranslatingPortProxy &proxy = tc->getVirtProxy();
pro
s not an indirect branch." In comparison for a
normal branch instruction (just b) the function B::branchTarget in
arm/arch/generated/decoder.cc is called. I found a similar function for
Bl, but not for Bx. Can it be that there is missing something?
Regards,
Tobias
Am 02.10.2012 22:19, sc
