Hi all,
I recently upgraded to changeset 9586:3c62e3b7f658 (latest), but I am no
longer able to restore from checkpoints with Garnet enabled (without
garnet works fine) -- previously I used the version from Sep 28 2012
(9268:a0ca00815cc4) without problems. I need the new version for the
added supp
a deadlock exists in the system,
> meaning that some request has not been satisfied within the allotted
> deadlock_threshold parameter. Turning on the ProtocolTrace debug flag,
> and grepping through the traces for the address specified will tell
> you when it was issued.
>
> Malek
heckpoint, but because the key
> difference between the 2 revisions are the ruby functional accesses, I
> am not sure if that upgrade-script would be enough. Someone else might
> have to comment if that script should do it.
>
> Malek
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Mar
Unfortunately this problem still persists in the latest version and I
have not been able to find the root-cause of this problem after some
further debugging.
I would like to emphasize that there are no issues without garnet
(simple network), but with garnet (flexible and fixed) the problem
describ
Hi all,
I would like to get clarification of the status of functional access
support for Ruby memory.
My goal is to enable Ruby functional accesses for FS mode.
However, from what I have seen in the code, is it correct that Ruby
functional accesses only work for SE at the moment? Would it be tri
Hi all,
I would like to ask if what I am trying to do is even possible (and if
so, how??), as I have been running into a few problems, despite
following the advice I could find in older mailing-list threads or the
wiki. My goal would be to run a full-system with ruby (with
MOESI_CMP_directory), mu
use of the assert failure was tracked down recently by Jason
> Power. The patch is on the review board. Here is the link -
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1365
>
> It will be committed to the mainline soon.
>
> --
> Nilay
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Marco Elver wrote:
>
nd run
> the same tests you have here to grab this backtrace? Also, can you
> collect and restore from checkpoint with a single CPU core and see
> what happens?
>
> Thanks!
> Joel
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Marco Elver <mailto:marco.el...@ed.ac.uk>
, run).
>
> I'll keep you posted on debugging. Thanks again,
> Joel
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Marco Elver <mailto:marco.el...@ed.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> I ran with 1 CPU and 16 CPUs and get essentially the same re
Hi all,
I would like to report the following problem since changeset
9206:f6483789d23a (Ruby System: Convert to Clocked Object). Additional
setup information: I am using Joel Hestness's changesets 9220, 9221,
9222 and http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1386/ to get restoring to O3CPU
working, otherwise I w
Object that
> are calls process() each time gdb breaks? This should give us a
> starting point for where to look.
>
> Thanks,
> Joel
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Marco Elver <mailto:marco.el...@ed.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I
:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Marco Elver wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to report the following problem since changeset
>> 9206:f6483789d23a (Ruby System: Convert to Clocked Object). Additional
>> setup information: I am using Joel Hestness's changesets 92
Hi all,
I am having a problem with a setup that used to work. The important flag
is --garnet-network, without which everything works just fine.
Versions from before Sep 05 in the dev repo were working, unfortunately
I don't have the exact commit when it stopped working; if nobody has an
idea what
:19, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Marco Elver wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am having a problem with a setup that used to work. The important flag
>> is --garnet-network, without which everything works just fine.
>>
>> Versions from before Sep 05 i
14 matches
Mail list logo
