[gem5-users] Re: regarding ERRORS in building of X86 ISA

What about running scons inside the gem5 directory instead of your home directory? And don't run it with sudo. ___ gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s

[gem5-users] Different values for different versions

Hi everyone, I am looking to work on 2 computers with different versions of gem5. When I have transferred the same executable from one PC to another and have tried the execution with the same command, they have given me different values in the L1 cache. The command I ran was: ~/gem5/build/ARM/ge

[gem5-users] Is it ok to remove `maxRoutingTableSizeCheck`?

Hi, We are trying to do some simulations. We are using a simulator based on an old version of Gem5 ([1] created to simulate a64fx chip). We made some further modifications, namely replaced `SnoopMask` to be of type `std::bitset<>` to be able to run more-or-less arbitrary number of cores. And ru

[gem5-users] Re: --take-checkpoints flag

Hi all, Just to follow up, because I can see that there have been some issues with not including all of the requisite issues in other threads, here is the full output from what I described above. gem5 Simulator System. http://gem5.org gem5 is copyrighted software; use the --copyright option for

[gem5-users] Re: --take-checkpoints flag

Hi Sam, Sorry for the frustration. Writing better documentation is always #2 on the priority list :(. I always tell people not to trust any of the "options" to fs.py and se.py. Those scripts have gotten so far beyond "out of hand" at this point that they are almost useless. They are trying to be

[gem5-users] Re: Is it ok to remove `maxRoutingTableSizeCheck`?

Hi Emil, You can remove that check. However, you should note that the classic caches aren't designed to support high-bandwidth operation. Also, this assert triggering could be a sign that there's infinite queuing somewhere (which is one reason why the classic caches aren't great for high bandwidth

[gem5-users] Re: --take-checkpoints flag

Hi Jason, Thanks for your help. I think I've honed in on the source of the problem -- namely, number of cpus. Is there a reason why having multiple CPUs in a particular configuration would limit the simulator's ability to write a checkpoint? Again, thank you for your help! Best, Sam On Wed, Sep

[gem5-users] Re: --take-checkpoints flag

Hi Sam, I would *guess* it's the draining code getting stuck in an infinite loop. The draining code calls "drain" on all SimObjects in the system, and they do their thing. Then, the drain code asks all SimObjects if they're done draining. If not, it starts over and calls drain on all objects again

[gem5-users] gem5 v21.1.0.1 hotfix release: Fix for 'deprecated attribute' warning

Dear all, The stable branch of the gem5 repository now contains the v21.1.0.1 hotfix release. This release fixes a bug where the build output was being flooded with "'deprecated' attribute directive ignored" warnings, as reported here: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-1063. While this bug ne

[gem5-users] Re: regarding ERRORS in building of X86 ISA

Sravani, You have been posting very frequently to this mailing list asking for help and, on at least two occasions, have ignored the feedback given to you. While we want to help new gem5 users, we cannot hold your hand through every problem. In case you are unaware, the gem5-users list is maintain