On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Xi Chen wrote:
Hi Nilay,
Thanks for the reply.
I double checked ruby.stats file and there are statistics about number of
L1, L2 misses. But I went through ruby.stats several times and did not find
any number about cache accesses number or cache hit number, so I still
cannot
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Cookie wrote:
Hi Nilay,
I used "$scons build/X86/gem5.fast RUBY=True PROTOCOL=MOESI_hammer " to
compile gem5 and ran it with "$build/X86/m5.debug -d ruby-output
configs/example/ruby_fs.py --kernel=x86_64-vmlinux-2.6.22.9.smp
--script=configs/boot/mcf.rcS --cpu-type=detailed
Dear All/Ali Saidi
Please send me basic instructions on m5.
with thanks
..
Musharaf
--- On Wed, 8/29/12, Ali Saidi wrote:
From: Ali Saidi
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] timing access model for dcache ports
To: gem5-users@gem5.org
Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2012, 2:53 PM
HI Amin,
It wo
Hello,
I unrolled revision 8930 and tried to boot the kernel, but it failed
because of the following error:
File "", line 1, in
File "/i3c/hpcl/mis5413/gem5/src/python/m5/main.py", line 359, in main
# once the script is done
File "/i3c/hpcl/mis5413/gem5/configs/example/ruby_fs.py", lin
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Mahshid Sedghi wrote:
Hello,
I unrolled revision 8930 and tried to boot the kernel, but it failed
because of the following error:
File "", line 1, in
File "/i3c/hpcl/mis5413/gem5/src/python/m5/main.py", line 359, in main
# once the script is done
File "/i3c/hpcl/mis
Hi all,
I have two traces from gem5(x86-linux) and pin-tool and I find that
some of the instructions are different.
For example, the "syscall" in pin-tool trace is different from the one
"sysret" in gem5 trace. The pc address is also not right.
Is that a bug in gem5 or a misuse of the trac
Hi Marco,
I'm currently trying to track down bugs in checkpoint restore to get
x86+Ruby+O3CPU working, and I'm having trouble replicating your bug. Could
you please compile build/X86_MOESI_hammer/gem5.debug and run the same tests
you have here to grab this backtrace? Also, can you collect and r
Thanks Tushar for your help and for suggesting the tool. I will study the
tool.
Thanks,
Pavan
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Tushar Krishna wrote:
> **
> Hmm your dynamic power is about 5.6mW per router, while static power is
> 52mW per router.
>
> The dynamic is probably low because of low ut
Hi Tushar,
I found "Message Delayed Cycles" histogram information in ruby.stats, I
wonder if the "average" is the latency for each messages. Also, I want to
run some synthetic benchmarks to evaluate my new topology with hammer
protocol in ruby simple network. I read the wiki page and know that
ne
