On Fri, January 25, 2013 7:22 pm, Mostafa Mahmoud Hassan wrote:
>
> I found the problem is that I compile the application on my 32-bit linux
> while the kernel is 64-bit (which I did not notice in the beginning and
> then assumed that 64 bit machine should be able to run 32 bit applications
> by na
with this ?
Regards
From: mostafa.m.has...@hotmail.com
To: gem5-users@gem5.org
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:44:17 +0200
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Running benchmark on FS X86 : Assertion
`!delayedResponse' failed.
Thanks alot Steve for the support. I will give it a try
Regards
Date: F
Thanks alot Steve for the support. I will give it a try
Regards
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:10:29 -0800
From: ste...@gmail.com
To: gem5-users@gem5.org
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Running benchmark on FS X86 : Assertion
`!delayedResponse' failed.
My suggestion for debugging this is to use
in command line) , no errors
> occur. Could the compilation of the benchmark be the root cause ??
>
> Mostafa
>
> > Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:31:28 -0600
> > From: ni...@cs.wisc.edu
> > To: mostafa.m.has...@hotmail.com
> > CC: gem5-users@gem5.org
>
the benchmark be the root cause ??
Mostafa
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:31:28 -0600
> From: ni...@cs.wisc.edu
> To: mostafa.m.has...@hotmail.com
> CC: gem5-users@gem5.org
> Subject: RE: [gem5-users] Running benchmark on FS X86 : Assertion
> `!delayedResponse' failed.
&
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Mostafa Mahmoud Hassan wrote:
I could not figure out what is the problem in the first place. All what
I can see is that the code behavior seems illogical because it will
certainly cause the assertion to fail consistently in timing mode
If the code that you are claimin
u
> To: mostafa.m.has...@hotmail.com
> CC: gem5-users@gem5.org
> Subject: RE: [gem5-users] Running benchmark on FS X86 : Assertion
> `!delayedResponse' failed.
>
> What all did you try to solve this issue? Your initial reasoning for the
> problem was certainly incorrect.
What all did you try to solve this issue? Your initial reasoning for the
problem was certainly incorrect.
--
Nilay
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Mostafa Mahmoud Hassan wrote:
Any guesses with this guys ?
Regards
--
why do you think that
Any guesses with this guys ?
Regards
--
why do you think that the walker inserted a translation then it was not
available when it comes to use it ?? could not it be the first time to look for
it and due to miss decided to perform
Hi Ali,
why do you think that the walker inserted a translation then it was not
available when it comes to use it ?? could not it be the first time to look for
it and due to miss decided to perform a walk inserting it for the first time ??
I see from the code in tlb.cc (starting from line
It appears as though the page table walker inserted a translation into the TLB
and then when it came to use that translation it wasn't available (and would
require another walk), which is causing the assert to happen. You should figure
out what is being inserted and why it isn't matching in the
s.wisc.edu
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 03:51:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Running benchmark on FS X86 : Assertion
`!delayedResponse' failed.
I traced this error and suspectthe behavior of this peice in recvPacket
function (lines 604-609 in
"build/X86_MESI_CMP_directory/arch/x86/pa
I traced this error and suspectthe behavior of this peice in recvPacket
function (lines 604-609 in
"build/X86_MESI_CMP_directory/arch/x86/pagetable_walker.cc")
bool delayedResponse;
Fault fault = walker->tlb->translate(req, tc, NULL, mode,
delayedRespons
13 matches
Mail list logo
