> From: Nizamudheen Ahmed via gem5-users
>> Reply-To: Nizamudheen Ahmed , gem5 users mailing
>> list
>> Date: Thursday, 11 September 2014 04:50
>> To: Steve Reinhardt , gem5 users mailing list <
>> gem5-users@gem5.org>
>> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] no
heen Ahmed , gem5 users mailing
> list
> Date: Thursday, 11 September 2014 04:50
> To: Steve Reinhardt , gem5 users mailing list <
> gem5-users@gem5.org>
> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] non-determinism in GEM5 stats
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the replies.
>
>
5-users@gem5.org>>
Date: Thursday, 11 September 2014 04:50
To: Steve Reinhardt mailto:ste...@gmail.com>>, gem5 users
mailing list mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>>
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] non-determinism in GEM5 stats
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies.
The input to the PARSEC is id
reas
>>>
>>> From: Nizamudheen Ahmed via gem5-users
>>> Reply-To: Nizamudheen Ahmed , gem5 users mailing
>>> list
>>> Date: Wednesday, 10 September 2014 16:50
>>> To: gem5 users mailing list
>>> Subject: [gem5-users] non-determinism i
e same you
>> will get exactly the same output (otherwise we would never be able to run
>> any regressions the way we do).
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> From: Nizamudheen Ahmed via gem5-users
>> Reply-To: Nizamudheen Ahmed , gem5 users mailing
>> list
>
he way we do).
>
> Andreas
>
> From: Nizamudheen Ahmed via gem5-users
> Reply-To: Nizamudheen Ahmed , gem5 users mailing
> list
> Date: Wednesday, 10 September 2014 16:50
> To: gem5 users mailing list
> Subject: [gem5-users] non-determinism in GEM5 stats
>
>
mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>>
Reply-To: Nizamudheen Ahmed
mailto:nizam.ah...@gmail.com>>, gem5 users mailing list
mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>>
Date: Wednesday, 10 September 2014 16:50
To: gem5 users mailing list mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>>
Subject: [gem5-users] non-deter
Hi champs,
I observe the stats.txt contain alarmingly different data across multiple
run of the same benchmark under same target configuration. For example, i
get 17% miss-rate and 5% miss-rate across two different runs.
Can you help me identifying what could be going wrong?
I have checkpointed