Re: [gem5-users] changesets are not sorted correctly

2012-04-17 Thread Mahmood Naderan
With the lack of knowledge with hg, it takes time to understand that. Thanks for that. On 4/17/12, Mark Browning wrote: > http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hg.1.html#bisect > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Mahmood Naderan > wrote: > >> mahmood@tiger:gem5$ hg bisect >> abort: cannot bisect (no

Re: [gem5-users] changesets are not sorted correctly

2012-04-17 Thread Mark Browning
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hg.1.html#bisect On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote: > mahmood@tiger:gem5$ hg bisect > abort: cannot bisect (no known good revisions) > > > On 4/17/12, Steve Reinhardt wrote: > > It's a flattened graph, not a linear sequence. > > > > If you u

Re: [gem5-users] changesets are not sorted correctly

2012-04-17 Thread Mahmood Naderan
mahmood@tiger:gem5$ hg bisect abort: cannot bisect (no known good revisions) On 4/17/12, Steve Reinhardt wrote: > It's a flattened graph, not a linear sequence. > > If you use 'hg bisect' it takes care of this. > > Steve > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Mahmood Naderan > wrote: > >> Hi >> If

Re: [gem5-users] changesets are not sorted correctly

2012-04-17 Thread Steve Reinhardt
It's a flattened graph, not a linear sequence. If you use 'hg bisect' it takes care of this. Steve On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote: > Hi > If you visit this page http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/shortlog/1e3ca5d77b53 > You can see that the changesets are not sorted correctly. >

[gem5-users] changesets are not sorted correctly

2012-04-17 Thread Mahmood Naderan
Hi If you visit this page http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/shortlog/1e3ca5d77b53 You can see that the changesets are not sorted correctly. 5 month ago 5 month ago ... 6 month ago 6 month ago ... 2 month ago 2 month ago ... 3 month ago 2 month ago 2 month ago ... For a trace back, I am not able to figure