Re: [gem5-users] Assertion `blocksInUse() == 0'

2013-09-30 Thread GE ZHIGUO
users mailing list' Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Assertion `blocksInUse() == 0' Thanks, I'll look into that. "Dreams are not made to put us to sleep, but to awaken us" - Goemans From: gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org [mailto:gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Korey Sewell Sent

Re: [gem5-users] Assertion `blocksInUse() == 0'

2012-05-24 Thread Yuval H. Nacson
Re: [gem5-users] Assertion `blocksInUse() == 0' Well it's hard to suggest a solution given that we dont know what changed w/the inorder code for this assert to get triggered. The basics is just that you need to understand what that "blocksInUse" variable is for. I think that

Re: [gem5-users] Assertion `blocksInUse() == 0'

2012-05-23 Thread Korey Sewell
Well it's hard to suggest a solution given that we dont know what changed w/the inorder code for this assert to get triggered. The basics is just that you need to understand what that "blocksInUse" variable is for. I think that it the number of blocks pending in the fetch unit, but to double check

[gem5-users] Assertion `blocksInUse() == 0'

2012-05-23 Thread Yuval H. Nacson
Hello, I'm toying around with the inorder CPU code and I'm trying to run two threads. I get the following message: gem5.debug: build/ALPHA_SE/cpu/inorder/resources/fetch_unit.cc:590: virtual void FetchUnit::trap(Fault, ThreadID, ThePipeline::DynInstPtr): Assertion `blocksInUse() == 0' fail