[gem5-users] Update [Garnet Network Dead Lock]: Running parsec benchmark stuck using mesi_three_level cluster_id

Hi everyone, I ran parsec.blackscholes benchmark with test(benchmark size) dataset, and it could get results in about 1 min. However `simsmall` dataset keeps running about 30 mins without an end. Is this normal situation? Or does it mean my gem5 garnet network runs into a dead lock or something

[gem5-users] Re: Error: snoop filter exceeded capacity

On 7/10/2023 5:17 PM, John Smith wrote: I understood how to pass it. However, --param='system.membus.snoop_filter=NULL' doesn't seem to work. I'm getting the following error: NameError: name 'NULL' is not defined I see. Well, this line was in an older version of XBar.py: snoop_filter = Param

[gem5-users] Re: Error: snoop filter exceeded capacity

On 7/10/2023 3:59 PM, John Smith via gem5-users wrote: I'm sorry. Here's the error message I got: build/X86/mem/snoop_filter.cc:197: panic: panic condition !is_hit && (cachedLocations.size() >= maxEntryCount) occurred: snoop filter exceeded capacity of 131072 cache blocks That snoop filter ca

[gem5-users] Cache Benchmark in Gem5

I'm wondering if the following code looks reasonable as a benchmark to test performance of L1D cache in Gem5. Changing the size of the L1 cache in Gem5 (from 32KiB to 1KiB) doesn't seem to show any significant change in the benchmark performance (~1%). I would have thought that using a 1KiB L1D

[gem5-users] Re: Error: snoop filter exceeded capacity

I'm sorry. Here's the error message I got: build/X86/mem/snoop_filter.cc:197: panic: panic condition !is_hit && (cachedLocations.size() >= maxEntryCount) occurred: snoop filter exceeded capacity of 131072 cache blocks Memory Usage: 17708540 KBytes Program aborted at tick 3777287772000 --- BEGIN LI

[gem5-users] Error: snoop filter exceeded capacity

Hi everyone, I'm facing the below error when running fs.py with the following configurations: ./build/X86/gem5.opt ./configs/example/fs.py --cpu-clock=1GHz \ -n 8 \ --mem-size=16GB \

[gem5-users] Question about SE mode

Hi, I am trying to run a workload in SE mode that was compiled for bare metal and directly deals with physical addresses. Is there any way to run such workloads in SE mode without incurring page faults? Thanks, Shankar ___ gem5-users mailing list -- gem

[gem5-users] Running parsec benchmark stuck using mesi_three_level cluster_id

Hi everyone, I am using the gem5 standard library to simulate a cluster architecture with Ruby MESI_THREE_LEVEL cache protocol. The Script I am using is configs/example/gem5_library/x86-parsec-benchmark.py. I create a new Topology file in src/python/gem5/components/cachehierarchies/ruby/topolog