I have tried this option, the problem is for a simple microbenchmark, if I
do not use KVM, the IPCs make no sense. I mean for the same configuration
if change --restore-with-cpu with KVM or atomic, the simulation starts and
end, but numbers make no sense.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 9:42 PM Bobby Bru
Hi,
When I was running SPEC CPU 2017, in particular 505.mcf_r, I noticed that
if gem5 should open a file, it will not make any progress. I dig into mcf
code and found when the read_min function is called the simulation freezes.
Then I started running a simple benchmark as follows, that just prints
Hello Everyone,
Is it possible to run a parallel version of a CPU benchmark like SPEC on
multiple cores?
For example, if I have a mesh of 9 CPU cores, can I launch 9 threads of the
CPU benchmark, 1 thread on each core simultaneously?
Thank you for the information in advance.
John Smith
_
Hi Gabriel,
I agree it's not intuitive and it's a bit awkward.
Is there a reason for adopting that design? My guess is that it allows to
> build the system top to bottom in the python scripts.
>
Haha! No, there's not an underlying reason for this. In fact, I would guess
that there is a much bett
Hi Jason,
Thanks for your reply, it should be an adequate solution, even if it looks kind
of awkward to me right now ;)
While I wanted the downstream controller (B) to have a reference to the
upstream (proxied) controller (A), I must actually do the opposite and have (A)
store a reference to (B
