Hello, because L0_I, L0_D, and L1 in MESI_Three_Level are private, and L2 is
shared. In my experiment, L1_I, L1_D, and L2 are private, and L3 is shared，so I
think
(1) Do I only need to replace all L0 in -L0cache.sm to L1, replace all L1
in L1cache.sm to L2, and replace all L2 in L2cache.sm t
Yes, you are getting it right.
Yeah if you wish to change the functioning of cache controller state
machine then only you should change the *.sm files.
Can you elaborate. The use case for clarification?
Regards,
Vipin Patel
On Sun, 26 Jul, 2020, 08:04 1154063264--- via gem5-users, <
gem5-users@ge
Sorry, I don’t fully understand what you mean ?
You mean is that, I can use MESI_Three_Level in the L1-L2-L3 cache, right?
If I want to use this protocol, I should modify the code of MESI_Three_Level,
such as modify L0cache.sm to L1cache.sm, modify L2cache.sm to L3cache.sm, right?
Looking forward
Hi,
I want to get the virtual address of the write packet accepted by the memory
controller.
However, I find that only read packets have virtual addresses. For write
packets, pkt->req->hasVaddr() is set false. It only has a physical
address.
Is there any method to get the virtual addresses of
Why wouldn't it work :-)? Have you tried/how it fails? How did
execution terminate Ctrl + C or a guest event?
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 7:13 AM as3mx--- via gem5-users
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I wanted to know if it is possible to resume the checkpoint generation from
> the last checkpoint generated. For
Hi All,
In my project , I need to compute power and performance from output of gem5
with dvfs.
How can I do them or which tools can I use for them?
___
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.
