Hi,
To my understanding, separate instruction and data microTLBs are
implemented in arm model with 64 entries in default. But the shared MacroTLB
is missing.
Best regards,
Yongbing Huang
From: gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org [mailto:gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org] On
Behalf Of Ami
That breakdown is not tracked. You will have to add your own counters.
- Tushar
Mahshid Sedghi wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I am using Garnet and would like to know the breakdown of the network
>latency. To be more exact, I want to know the queuing latency as well
>as
>transfer latency. It seems that th
Hi,
I would like to know if the Micro-TLB feature is being implemented in Gem5 ARM
model ?
If yes, then are there separate Instruction and Data MicroTLBs ?
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Tara
___
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cg
Very strange... if it's not making progress, it must be livelocked, because
otherwise you would hit the max_tick event and exit. You should be able to
jump in with gdb, turn on a few trace flags, and see what's happening.
If any of these are benchmarks that used to complete, you could use 'hg
bis
Hi Everyone,
Has anyone else noticed odd behaviour where gem5 stops making progress
in some applications?
I'm currently experiencing this on an x86 system simulating an x86
system in FS mode. I've seen this happening in some of the SPEC CPU2006
benchmarks (450.soplex/ref, 454.calculix/ref, 4
You should look at handleResponse function in cache_impl.hh. Based on the
type of the request type (read or write), you could get the penalty.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Bhawna Jain wrote:
> How can we obtain cache miss read and write penalties in gem5? Not average
> but exact miss penalty
How can we obtain cache miss read and write penalties in gem5? Not average
but exact miss penalty for a single read and single write.
___
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users