Thanks Tushar!
Jinzhu
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Tushar Krishna wrote:
> Hmmm the ruby_network_tester is supposed to be used only with the
> NetworkTest coherence protocol …
> Not sure how it interacts with other protocols.
> With Hammer, I would suggest using ruby_random_test
>
> Don't k
The cause of the assert failure was tracked down recently by Jason Power.
The patch is on the review board. Here is the link -
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1365
It will be committed to the mainline soon.
--
Nilay
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Marco Elver wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to ask if what I a
Hi all,
I would like to ask if what I am trying to do is even possible (and if
so, how??), as I have been running into a few problems, despite
following the advice I could find in older mailing-list threads or the
wiki. My goal would be to run a full-system with ruby (with
MOESI_CMP_directory), mu
Hmmm the ruby_network_tester is supposed to be used only with the NetworkTest
coherence protocol …
Not sure how it interacts with other protocols.
With Hammer, I would suggest using ruby_random_test
Don't know how controllers work with multiple input links. I think they should
work fine.
In any
That is the combined power for entire NoC.
If you want individual router power, and/or breakdown of individual components,
look at network/orion/NetworkPower.cc
- Tushar
On Aug 28, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Pavan Poluri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have done a full system simulation with 8 cores, 8 routers,
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for the info.
When do you expect the DRAM controller model will be available?
If it it going to take a while, is it possible for me to get an early release
version for testing?
Thanks.
Victor
From: Andreas Hansson
To: Victor Ling ; g
Hi Victor,
We are in the process of submitting a DRAM controller model to the review
board. This will enable you to evaluate the impact of different DRAM
organisations as you suggest.
Stay tuned…
Andreas
From: Victor Ling mailto:victor_lin...@yahoo.com>>
Reply-To: Victor Ling
mailto:victor_l
Thanks Anthony.
I renamed the image file to contain the "android" word. Now there are no
kernel panic messages.
I have a few additional questions:
1. How long does the Android boot usually take? I have been running the
simulation for about 2.5 hours now but the screen is still stuck on the
Andro
Hi Nathanaël,
Sent from my ARM powered mobile device
On Aug 28, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Nathanaël Prémillieu wrote:
> Hi Ali,
>
> Thank for your response.
> I was thinking that data instructions as branch was a specificity of ARMv7.
> In The ARM Architecture Reference Manual, p. 170, it is stated
Hello,
I have done a full system simulation with 8 cores, 8 routers, 8 L2 caches
on a mesh topology with garnet's fixed pipeline implementation. The
simulation statistics can be seen in ruby.stats file that contains router
power statistics like router dynamic power, router static power, router
clo
Hi Ali,
Thank for your response.
I was thinking that data instructions as branch was a specificity of
ARMv7. In The ARM Architecture Reference Manual, p. 170, it is stated that:
"In ARMv7, a processor in ARM state can also enter Thumb state (and
change to executing Thumb instructions) by execut
Hi Nathanaël,
The use of data instructions as branches is deprecated so we chose not to mark
them as branches and I'd hope you're not seeing too much use of them. If you
care the isBranch kwarg can be passed to the various data instructions in
src/arch/arm/isa/insts/data.isa like it is for the
Hi all,
I compiled splash2 benchmarks (kernel part exactly ) statically on my own
(x86-64 bit linux machine with 2.6.28-15 kernel and glibc 2.13 ,gcc 4.5.2)
and put them on the disk img file. They got run without errors but results
seems incorrect. Here comes details.
All x86 full system staff (pr
Hi All,
Any thoughts on that matter ? Because not having these instructions
identified as control instructions causes the branch predictor to not
predict them, increasing the number of branch mispredictions.
It seems that some load instructions have also this problem.
Thanks,
Nathanaël
Le 2
Actually Pt2Pt will also have a deadlock if the sim cycles are that
many.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:57 AM, gem5 gem5 wrote:
> Hi Tushar,
>
> I wonder if all the nodes(controllers) need to have a router before them.
> This is what I have seen for all the topologies created in GEM5. I have
> t
15 matches
Mail list logo