Re: [gem5-users] Issue Defining new Ruby Topology/ On-chip versus Off-chip

2012-04-01 Thread Tushar Krishna
Hi Malek, The "int" links just mean links internal to the network, and "ext" links just mean links connecting the network to the external world, i.e. the cache/directory controllers. They have nothing to do with on-chip vs off-chip. The L2 being shared or private depends on the coherence protoco

Re: [gem5-users] Out of range means pio port?

2012-04-01 Thread Tony
Tony Feng gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi, > > In M5Port::recvFunctional of RubyPort.cc, if the isPhysMemAddress test fails, does it necessarily mean it is a packet sent to a pio port? > > I added some debugging info, found the packet has an invalid source id, and a destination address of 0x800

Re: [gem5-users] Issue Defining new Ruby Topology/ On-chip versus Off-chip

2012-04-01 Thread Malek Musleh
Hi Tushar, I am looking for clarification between configuring caches to be on-chip versus off-chip in GEM5. It seems to me that each router represents a single chip, So in connecting multiple L1 caches to a shared L2 via "ext_link" correlate to all of them being on-chip, and then this chip/router

[gem5-users] Out of range means pio port?

2012-04-01 Thread Tony Feng
Hi, In M5Port::recvFunctional of RubyPort.cc, if the isPhysMemAddress test fails, does it necessarily mean it is a packet sent to a pio port? I added some debugging info, found the packet has an invalid source id, and a destination address of 0x8000, whereas I believe the system port range is

[gem5-users] Problem with using lmbench in simulated console

2012-04-01 Thread Jinchun Kim
Hello. I'm using lmbench to measure the performance of simulated console. How can I open result text file of lmbench? The text file was made in lmbench/results directory, but vi and vim were not available in simulated console. Also, this result file doesn't exist in the x86root.img which includ