On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Teo Mazars
wrote:
...
> add a "gamma-correction" toggle if needed (like the "srgb" boolean in over.
In this particular instance I would offer the opposite advice :).
Remove the "gamma-correction" toggle / "srgb" boolean, and create a
separate "gegl:over-perceptual"
I am not convinced. The way it's done is fine in my opinion, mainly because
it doesn't duplicate the implementation. What you suggest would be to
create specialized meta operations foo-linear and foo-perceptual on top of
foo with fixed "srgb" parameters and to hide foo... Right? I am not sure
why t
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Téo Mazars wrote:
> I am not convinced. The way it's done is fine in my opinion, mainly because
> it doesn't duplicate the implementation. What you suggest would be to create
> specialized meta operations foo-linear and foo-perceptual on top of foo with
> fixed "srg
