On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:00:20PM +0200, Miguel S?nchez de Le?n Peque wrote:
>Hi all,
>I'm a student interested in contributing to gEDA and learn some C ;-).
>The biggest problem I find any time I start coding is "how should I
>write this?". You're always talking about deprecated c
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:41:19AM -0500, John Griessen wrote:
> David SMITH wrote:
>> John Griessen wrote:
>>> David C. Kerber wrote:
If you've got a carbon frame, you could drop it into the seat tube,
where it would never be seen, and therefore never removed by a
thief...
>>> Thi
Hi all,
sorry for the offtopic; we have a broken part which supposed to be a
transducer in a board driving a tiny CRT. The sticker on the part says
"Lucius & Baer TYP: VM 102-L" (http://igor2.repo.hu/tmp/VM102.jpg).
Has anyone met this part or does anyone have an idea for a
substitute?
Regard
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:40:25PM -0600, John Doty wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:23 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
>
> > If
> > there still is no change, it must be gmane munging header and encoding.
>
> Still in base64. Raw text of your message reads:
>
> UmljayBDb2xsaW5zIHdyb3RlOgoKPj53aW5k
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:16:01AM -0400, Rick Collins wrote:
> But I suppose it is better to re-invent the wheel. There is no reason to
> try to foster any sort of compatibility in file formats between all the
> different CAD tools. There are always conversion programs to be written,
> no?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:26:28AM -0400, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:08:25PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> > XML is far too heavy, agreed, and it's signal-to-noise ratio is abysmal.
> > I think that using a Lisp (or Lispy-looking) format would be extensible,
> > easy to parse
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:52:26AM -0400, al davis wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 September 2010, Rub?n G?mez Antol? wrote:
> > Gnucap 2009.12 is so stable, why not released?
> >
> > (In several days, I think even ask at debian maintainer to
> > include snapshots, at least, in experimental branch of
> >
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:57:48PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:19:39PM +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:26 -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> >
> > > I'm just throwing ideas into the air. What do you guys think?
> > >
> >
> > Andrew, I am not
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 10:27:31AM +, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> If I remember correctly, a major factor in the closure of the gEDA-dev list
> was that the signal to noise ratio became very low. There were several
> people, few of whom *ever* submitted patches, loudly and rudely telling the
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 09:23:17PM -0500, Mark wrote:
> So, because I use several methods, a single one-size-fits-all library is just
> not going to work for me.
> I *could* make use of a library of heavy symbols but I still need the
> lightweight symbols, too. If I
> was forced to choose
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:51:19PM +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> John Doty writes:
>
> > On Dec 29, 2010, at 6:23 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> >
> >> I can imagine that it's not a lot, since this is really a classical
> >> case for said design pattern.
> >
> > The real difficulty here is t
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:48:00PM -0800, Oliver King-Smith wrote:
>Being lazy I am importing footprints other folks kindly made for pcb.
>Unfortunately, I am not very trusting, so I want to check they are
>correct.
>I can measure the size of stuff using gerbv (there may be a better
Hi Karl,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:29:21PM +0100, Karl Hammar wrote:
> Tibor:
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:51:19PM +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> ...
> > > And when that's the case, a clean C-API that can be exported to Guile,
> > > Python, Ruby, C++, Fortran, ... just dreaming.
> [the above
Hello Markus,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:11:31PM +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> having run an open source electronics project with the intention of
> collaborative development for a few months now, the experience is less
> than inspiring. So I'm looking for opinions on how to do bett
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:22:02AM +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> ge...@igor2.repo.hu writes:
>
> > If you edit one object, that won't ever move other objects around by
> > side effect. VCS systems I know depend on this feature. I think PCB
> > already provides this feature, keeping order of
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:26:58AM +, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Monday 17 Jan 2011 08:58:18 John Doty wrote:
> > On Jan 17, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> > > Due to the way the gschem editing model works, and particularly the undo
> > > system, stuff tends to get shifted to the end
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 07:26:12PM -0500, Darryl Gibson wrote:
> Hello Group,
>
> I'm curious what folks are using for time tracking and/or billing?
>
> Spreadsheets, software?
We have a custom software called "wt" (as working time). It is designed
by programmers for programmers, to minimize ad
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 10:51:00AM -0400, Bob Paddock wrote:
> The developers always wanted to know "the fastest way" to do something
> and had no interest in learning "the best way" to do something.
Lately I had the chance to work together with professional software
developers from multiple
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:58:51AM +0530, Abhijit Kshirsagar wrote:
> 1. Agree! I'd find this much more intuitive and easy to work with. The
> layers option will be a big help...
+1
I also like the ieda of dropping component/solder side, replacing it
with whatever else that suggests "one side" a
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Andrew Seddon wrote:
> Yes I got this.
>
> OT: I'm new hear so please feel free to ignore this comment, but might
> it be worth switching to google groups or similar? The interface is
> nice and you can use it like a traditional mailing list if desired.
L
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:36:20AM -0400, rickman wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 8:56 AM, ge...@igor2.repo.hu wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Andrew Seddon wrote:
>>> Yes I got this.
>>>
>>> OT: I'm new hear so please feel free to ignore this comment, but might
>>> it be worth switching
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:35:28PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> Another note - when uploading the EXE, please be sure to upload ALL
> the sources used to build it - yes, all the .tar.gz for all the
> libraries built. Really. Kai and I can't make the binary available
> without also making all tho
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 04:15:16PM -0400, rickman wrote:
> On 4/4/2011 11:44 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>> A.Burinskiy wrote:
>>
>>> I did not saw satisfactory analog viewer for ngspice. Could you please
>>> send me a link or project name?
>> Over the years several waveform projects have been toss
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:24:53PM +0100, Thomas Oldbury wrote:
>Is there a Python api for gEDA?
I once made a GPMI plugin for PCB. Unfortunately it contains only a
small set of interface libraries so what can be done was limited. I've
written an SVG exporter prototype in tcl, an interactive
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:35:38PM -0700, yamazakir2 wrote:
> Do you guys use your linux box for general desktop usage or only EDA?
> I ask because I have tried many times to make the switch to linux for
> general desktop usage but can't get over the inconvenience of it. I
> have a linux box specif
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:56:27AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> Just FYI, turns out the place that hosts my secondary DNS was *also*
> out for the hurricane. Not much I can do about that - my paranoia
> only goes so far ;-)
>
I could host sec dns for the site in central Europe if that helps.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:03:14AM +0530, Abhijit Kshirsagar wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 04:42, Markus Hitter wrote:
> > Am 10.09.2011 um 13:35 schrieb Stefan Salewski:
> >
> >> A lot of documentation can be bad.
> >
> > Ha! Now that's exactly the right answer to somebody offering writing
> >
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:08:15PM -0500, Stan Katz wrote:
>
>I use gEDA for small projects. One, and two sided boards only. It's
>been fine up until now. I now have a transceiver chip with some pins,
>a number of which I need to run to pin 1 on an IDE header. No matter
>how I dra
28 matches
Mail list logo
