Re: gEDA-user: gnetlist missing features

2009-07-26 Thread Levente Kovacs
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:22:44 +0200 Stefan Salewski wrote: > An other method may be a SPECIAL connection symbol in gschem for > connecting nets. I think that would be a nice solution. You could then add starpoints in power and ground nets. Levente -- Levente Kovacs http://logonex.eu __

Re: gEDA-user: gnetlist missing features

2009-07-02 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:08 -0700, John P. Doty wrote: > > The question then is: what is a simple set of logical rules that should > govern shorted nets? Yesterday I have seen some more connected nets in my DSO schematics -- to ensure that it will work I have replaced them now with always the

Re: gEDA-user: gnetlist missing features

2009-07-01 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:08 -0700, John P. Doty wrote: > > You've told gnetlist to short PreAmpPD to 3.3V. What happens then is > undefined. My experience is that gnetlist's behavior is difficult to > predict in such cases: sometimes it chooses one net name over another, > and sometimes it leav

Re: gEDA-user: gnetlist missing features

2009-07-01 Thread John P. Doty
Stefan Salewski wrote: > There was some discussion about netlist generation on this list > recently, so maybe it is a good time to speak about missing features: > > I have some OpAmps with power down pins (active low) in my schematics, I > have connected an io symbol to it with an attribute like >

gEDA-user: gnetlist missing features

2009-07-01 Thread Stefan Salewski
There was some discussion about netlist generation on this list recently, so maybe it is a good time to speak about missing features: I have some OpAmps with power down pins (active low) in my schematics, I have connected an io symbol to it with an attribute like "net=PreAmpPD:1". If I connect th