Ethan Swint wrote:
> $0.02 request/opinion from me: a keyword, rather than a number, so that
> arguments can be optional and more-human readable?
>
Well, the current file format of gschem relies entirely on positional
parameters. I was just dealing with the documentation.
The positional parame
On 05/25/2011 06:22 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:04:04PM +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote:
I like this idea!
Had the same problem few times...
+1
done.
---<)kaimartin(>---
$0.02 request/opinion from me: a keyword, rather than a number, so
Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:04:04PM +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote:
>> I like this idea!
>
> Had the same problem few times...
>
> +1
>
done.
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:04:04PM +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote:
> I like this idea!
Had the same problem few times...
+1
--
Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication" -- Leonardo da Vinci
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@
I like this idea!
Am 25.05.2011 16:46, schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
While looking into ways to beautify my symbols, I just looked at the file
format documentation in
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:file_format_spec
The meaning of fields is given in tables. I find myself counting lines in
the tab
While looking into ways to beautify my symbols, I just looked at the file
format documentation in
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:file_format_spec
The meaning of fields is given in tables. I find myself counting lines in
the table to identify which item to change in my symbols. How about a colum
6 matches
Mail list logo
