On Mar 1, 2007, at 9:32 AM, al davis wrote:
"expensable petty cash" range of money for a bounty
setting business.
That's why I made my comment. The person who created the
software has already demonstrated some commitment. If I
was ready to pay for an enhancement to Icarus Verilog, I
would onl
On Thursday 01 March 2007 08:56, John Griessen wrote:
> al davis wrote:
> Even if it all is in the
>
> >> "expensable petty cash" range of money for a bounty
> >> setting business.
> >
> > That's why I made my comment. The person who created the
> > software has already demonstrated some commitm
al davis wrote:
Even if it all is in the
"expensable petty cash" range of money for a bounty setting
business.
That's why I made my comment. The person who created the
software has already demonstrated some commitment. If I was
ready to pay for an enhancement to Icarus Verilog, I would onl
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 18:20, John Griessen wrote:
> > al davis wrote:
> >> I can't see paying just anyone who comes along for
> >> enhancements to an active project.
> >
> Stephen Williams wrote:
> > > Well, that's up to the client to decide, isn't it?
>
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 18:20
John Griessen wrote:
> Stephen Williams wrote:
>> al davis wrote:
>
>> An advantage of electronic payments is that they can be done
>> internationally with little fuss by credit card.
>>
>>> I can't see paying just anyone who comes along for enhancements to an
>>> active project.
>>
>> Well, that'
Stephen Williams wrote:
al davis wrote:
An advantage of electronic payments is that they can be done
internationally with little fuss by credit card.
I can't see paying just anyone who comes along for enhancements
to an active project.
Well, that's up to the client to decide, isn't it?
T
On 2/28/07, al davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only place I see for broadcast bounties I see is to get
something new. I have been considering offering a bounty for
someone to make a good quality replacement for autotools. It's
even on GNU's list of needs, but they want to do in in guile
wh
al davis wrote:
> Why all that overhead?
>
> The people who made the software have already established a
> track record. Anyone funding it will do so based on that. We
> don't need the middleman. They can just send a check.
An advantage of electronic payments is that they can be done
interna
Why all that overhead?
The people who made the software have already established a
track record. Anyone funding it will do so based on that. We
don't need the middleman. They can just send a check.
I can't see paying just anyone who comes along for enhancements
to an active project.
The on
John Griessen wrote:
> Creating google checkout buttons is easy -- if you have no shipping
> costs, (as in FOSS added to project CVS or SVN repository), you could
> have a series of them for small project chunks, and they get paid as you
> go...
>
> Take for instance the $500 project. divide it
10 matches
Mail list logo
