On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:34:04PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Andrew Poelstra wrote:
>
> > I like KMK's
> >>click/double-click idea if possible.
> >
> > Very possible. But you would still be unable to toggle visibility
> > independent of selection using the mouse.
>
> Why is this so?
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> I like KMK's
>>click/double-click idea if possible.
>
> Very possible. But you would still be unable to toggle visibility
> independent of selection using the mouse.
Why is this so? Are double clicked items automatically selected
in GTK widgets?
> How important i
Colin D Bennett wrote:
> I really dislike the double-click idea. I often need to quickly
> enable/disable visibility of multiple layers,
Nothing beats accel-keys for fast actions. In this case [ctrl-N] or
[shift-N] would be the natural choice.
> and the last thing I need is to have to doubl
Stephen Ecob wrote:
> Can they
>> be shrunk and still be clear enough not to look silly? That would
>> speed up page loading.
>
> Thanks, I think I'll do that.
The only time I got noticable download delays was with the details
page for each product. IMHO, it would be best to use the same image
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Joshua <[1]jos...@laserlinc.com>
wrote:
I agree with Delorie. I also was only making slow progress with
gattrib. I found the copy and paist functionality limited and
strange. I also was confronted with the add column bug. If I
remember
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:49:22AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:57:33 -0700
> Andrew Poelstra wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:50:25AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > > I like the color swatch and how it shows a small
> > > rectangle of the layer color when the
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:57:33 -0700
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:50:25AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > I like the color swatch and how it shows a small
> > rectangle of the layer color when the layer is hidden; if this
> > swatch were the show/hide toggle, that would be
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:50:25AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
>
> I really dislike the double-click idea. I often need to quickly
> enable/disable visibility of multiple layers, and the last thing I need
> is to have to double-click each button. I would much prefer a small
> region on the but
I agree with Delorie. I also was only making slow progress with
gattrib. I found the copy and paist functionality limited and strange.
I also was confronted with the add column bug. If I remember correctly
it corrupted my files when it shifted the properties from one heading to
the next. Th
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:25:06 -0700
Jared Casper wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
>
> > 2. Whenever you hide a layer, the selector would jump to the
> > previously-selected layer. I haven't tried it yet, but I
> > think that from a user's perspective that
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:13:37PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > Very possible. But you would still be unable to toggle visibility
> > independent of selection using the mouse. How important is this
> > to people? It bothers me, but only because there is no keyboard
> > shortcut in Gtk for toggli
> Very possible. But you would still be unable to toggle visibility
> independent of selection using the mouse. How important is this
> to people? It bothers me, but only because there is no keyboard
> shortcut in Gtk for toggling visibility.
Ctrl- doesn't toggle visibility? That's what the less
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:25:06AM -0700, Jared Casper wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Poelstra <[1]as...@sfu.ca>
>wrote:
>
> 2. Whenever you hide a layer, the selector would jump to the
>
> previously-selected layer. I haven't tried it yet, but I
> t
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Poelstra <[1]as...@sfu.ca>
wrote:
2. Whenever you hide a layer, the selector would jump to the
previously-selected layer. I haven't tried it yet, but I
think that from a user's perspective that would make the
visibility
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:29:13AM +0200, Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
> 2011/8/18 Andrew Poelstra :
>
> > Kai (and others), what do you think of this mockup?:
> >
> > http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
>
> Looks good. It resembles GtkTreeView and that raises a question - will
> it
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:12:34AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Andrew Poelstra wrote:
>
> > Kai (and others), what do you think of this mockup?:
> >
> > http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
>
> Layer names with white background are much easier to read than white
> on color we have
Bert Timmerman wrote:
> BTW, we could truncate layernames in buttons:
ack.
> "pins/pads" --> "leads"
Better: Divide these. Pads are different from pins. Pads reside on only
one layer while pins are spanning all layers. During my recent multilayer
layout it would have been handy to disable pad
I am happy that doc is still useful.
Best Wishes to All here at geda,
Steve M.
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 08:44 -0500, kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Colin D Bennett wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:35:46 -0500 (CDT)
> > kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >> I am sure this has
Павел Таранов wrote:
> We need a library as big as possible (not just basic symbols).
ack.
In an ideal world, we'd have both: A comprehesive lib of symbols,
footprints and simulation models that represent all existing components.
And a subset that represents a reasonalble choice to begin with.
DJ Delorie wrote:
>> I think the concept of import/exporting into a spreadsheet program
>> is an approach worthy of consideration as well.
>
> http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/dj_delorie/tools/sch2csv
> http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/dj_delorie/tools/csv2sch
Sure, comma separated lists can be im
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> Kai (and others), what do you think of this mockup?:
>
> http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
Layer names with white background are much easier to read than white
on color we have now. If it were me, the colored squares could be a
tad larger without increasig t
Steven Michalske wrote:
> I really like this one. Bonus points for setting layer color by
> clicking on the colored rectangle.
This should be part of a "properties dialog" for the respective layer.
Properties may include attributes like "skip-DRC", DRC rules specific
to this layer, layer name,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:48:31 +0200
"Bert Timmerman" wrote:
> > I think such a thing would look like:
> > http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/selector.png
> >
> > What do people think of this?
>
> IMHO, the former proposal with visibilty buttons without "rectangles"
> is the improvement we are loo
>
> Which browser and OS are you using ?
>
Chrome (with default settings i.e. JS enabled) on WinXP Pro SP3 32 bit.
Haven't tried it at home with FF on LMDE 64 bit.
:)
BTW; just submitted a couple of your pages to:
http://validator.w3.org/
Quite a few errors. H.
:(
Andy
___
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:05:33 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Andrew Poelstra wrote:
>
> > I think such a thing would look like:
> > http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/selector.png
> >
> > What do people think of this?
>
> Invisibility by greyed out buttons is much more easily grasped
> on a gl
25 matches
Mail list logo
