On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:24:53PM +0100, Thomas Oldbury wrote:
>Is there a Python api for gEDA?
I once made a GPMI plugin for PCB. Unfortunately it contains only a
small set of interface libraries so what can be done was limited. I've
written an SVG exporter prototype in tcl, an interactive
cheers, I'll look more closely at me setup
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:16 PM, DJ Delorie <[1]d...@delorie.com> wrote:
> I have been attempting to build polystitch.c against
pcb+gl_experimental
> without much luck. Also had some issue against pcb git head... Has
anyone
> el
> I have been attempting to build polystitch.c against pcb+gl_experimental
> without much luck. Also had some issue against pcb git head... Has anyone
> else had any luck with polystitch.c building against recent versions?
I build mine with head as of May 1. Let me rebuild and see what
happens..
On May 18, 2011, at 7:57 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
> Actually I think gEDA is not too bad for components/symbols really.
> What the default library lacks, gedsymbols often has. With a little bit
> more promotion of gedasymbols I think people wouldn't have such an
> issue.
> In terms of the
I have been attempting to build polystitch.c against
pcb+gl_experimental without much luck. Also had some issue against pcb
git head... Has anyone else had any luck with polystitch.c building
against recent versions?
cheers,
Geoff
> > Examples
> > are the next to unusable default library of geda
>
> As has been discussed many times, this cannot be fixed, since there
is no
> narrow, common use case for gEDA. Even the big $$ tools can't get
this
> right, so how can we? A narrowly targeted, inflexible to
On Wed, 18 May 2011 18:39:43 -0600
John Doty wrote:
>
> On May 18, 2011, at 6:31 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>
> > Examples
> > are the next to unusable default library of geda
>
> As has been discussed many times, this cannot be fixed, since there is no
> narrow, common use case for gEDA. Ev
On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:17:34 +0100
Peter Clifton wrote:
> Anyway, it would be worth testing to check
I tested it on my notebook. It has an Atom CPU with an intel GPU.
With the GL renderer it can do 7fps.
With the original renderer it is 7.2.
No significant change.
Levente
--
Levente Kovacs
On Wed, 18 May 2011 18:39:43 -0600
John Doty wrote:
>
> On May 18, 2011, at 6:31 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>
> > Examples
> > are the next to unusable default library of geda
>
> As has been discussed many times, this cannot be fixed, since there
> is no narrow, common use case for gEDA. Ev
Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> Judging the
> code by lack of comments without knowledge of the language is too.
I referred to the lack of documentation, rather than lack of comments.
The particular case I had in mind, is the interaction of gnetlist's
C front-end with the scheme back-ends. There seem
On May 18, 2011, at 6:31 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Examples
> are the next to unusable default library of geda
As has been discussed many times, this cannot be fixed, since there is no
narrow, common use case for gEDA. Even the big $$ tools can't get this right,
so how can we? A narrowly
Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> Why is there so much discussion here about the needs of potential new
> users, instead of the needs of current, loving, existing users? Let's
> make the tools perfect for us (that includes discoverability and
> documentation improvements), and not cater for not-yet-user
Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> I don't really care. Well, on a Spanish keyboard, + does not need
> any modifier but = is actually Shift-0.
Same on German keyboards.
> As I've already said, the only things that worries me is potentially
> pervasive and time-consuming operations triggered by single k
I have a collection of similar projects, each of which refer to a common
set of hierarchical sub-schematics, which were located in the directory
of the first project. I needed to prepare a tarball for one of the
other projects, so I cleaned up the mess, and moved the symbols and
schematics of the
On May 18, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> The problem in not only missing documentation, but the fact that not all
> geda guile code is really clean and beautiful, as stated by one of the
> experts some time ago on this list. I don't know if that is true, but I
> have seen that even e
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:09:10PM -0400, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2011 13:54:15 +0200
> Gabriel Paubert wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 03:04:18PM -0400, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:29:46 +0200
> > > Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > >
> > > > Peter Cl
Colin D Bennett writes:
> First, let's be clear that popularity is no indication of usefulness or
> goodness of something.
>
> But, if a product is less widely-chosen, perhaps there is something
> that can be done to improve the learning curve for new users...
Why is there so much discussion he
Is there a Python api for gEDA?
Because that would be really nice...
On 18 May 2011 20:56, Stefan Salewski <[1]m...@ssalewski.de> wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:26 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Russell Shaw wrote:
>
> > I think Scheme could be made much more attractive in
Kai-Martin Knaak writes:
> Russell Shaw wrote:
>
>> I think Scheme could be made much more attractive in geda if
>> it was adequately explained in documentation or a tutorial.
>
> +1
> I wouldn't mind to learn (a new language). But to learn a new language by
> almost non-commented code is just
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:26 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Russell Shaw wrote:
>
> > I think Scheme could be made much more attractive in geda if
> > it was adequately explained in documentation or a tutorial.
>
> +1
> I wouldn't mind to learn (a new language). But to learn a new language by
On Wed, 18 May 2011 13:54:15 +0200
Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 03:04:18PM -0400, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:29:46 +0200
> > Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> >
> > > Peter Clifton wrote:
> > >
> > > >>the two '=' or remove the whole part 'a={"=" "="}',
On May 17, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> BTW, what are the show cases for geda/pcb
One of gEDA's great strengths is that it works well with other tools, so it's a
great toolkit when the project isn't contained within a pure EDA environment.
The trouble is that such a project is d
On 18/05/2011, Russell Shaw wrote:
> > On 17/05/2011, John Doty wrote:
> >>
> >> On May 17, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Russell Shaw wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Most guis hide what they do. I believe in them showing the commands
> they
> >>> send internally as a script would (or atleast have the option
Russell Shaw wrote:
> I think Scheme could be made much more attractive in geda if
> it was adequately explained in documentation or a tutorial.
+1
I wouldn't mind to learn (a new language). But to learn a new language by
almost non-commented code is just too much of a barrier.
---<)kaimartin
On 19/05/11 02:13, DJ Delorie wrote:
I'm a gtk hater, and am open to new widget toolkit user interface paradigms,
So, you build pcb with --enable-gui=lesstif ? ;-)
I do it with gtk whenever i want to poke at it. I know how gtk
works, but it's far too convoluted and burdensome for developin
On Tue, 17 May 2011 22:30:27 -0400
DJ Delorie wrote:
> > BTW, what are the show cases for geda/pcb?
>
> There's a list on gpleda.org:
>
> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:links
First, let's be clear that popularity is no indication of usefulness or
goodness of something.
But, if a product is le
Hi Gang,
Is anyone else going to Maker Faire this weekend?
http://makerfaire.com/
Maybe we could arrange to meet up and chat.
Clif
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
> I'm a gtk hater, and am open to new widget toolkit user interface paradigms,
So, you build pcb with --enable-gui=lesstif ? ;-)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Can I enter my own project Super OSD?
[1]http://code.google.com/p/super-osd
On 18 May 2011 03:25, Kai-Martin Knaak <[2]k...@lilalaser.de> wrote:
Stefan Salewski wrote:
> While gEDA/PCB has some serious
> users and a large list of projects done with gEDA, KiCAD users seems
On 18/05/11 12:28, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Russell Shaw wrote:
The problem with KiCAD is 1) C++, 2) Qt.
The problems I encountered with gnetlist were
1) scheme
I think Scheme could be made much more attractive in geda if
it was adequately explained in documentation or a tutorial.
I haven't
> On 17/05/2011, John Doty wrote:
>>
>> On May 17, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Russell Shaw wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Most guis hide what they do. I believe in them showing the commands they
>>> send internally as a script would (or atleast have the option to show
>>> that) so the user can paste the commands into
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 03:04:18PM -0400, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:29:46 +0200
> Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>
> > Peter Clifton wrote:
> >
> > >>the two '=' or remove the whole part 'a={"=" "="}', what will
> > >>remove this key-binding for this menu-item.
> > >
>
Am 18.05.2011 um 04:25 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
kicad is the EDA chosen by some high profile open hardware projects:
* reprap (http://reprap.org/wiki/KiCad)
As a RepRapper I can say, there is no such thing like a "choosen
EDA". People use what they like most and that's Eagle for some 90% o
33 matches
Mail list logo
